“Communication cannot be anything but the communication of communicability.. . .; but, as such, communication implies an exteriority that originally transforms it into communication of something: it is in this way that language gives rise to poetic singularity and to philosophical generality (6).
Poetic singularity is the semiotic horizon of reason’s failing; it is where poetic language becomes conscious of itself as materiality (in the semiotic event) to the betrayal of “communication of something.” Philosophical generality, prose, is the betrayed communication. In this binary, the poetic is placed after philosophical generality: the semiotic event of enjambment can only occur from the presupposed material intention of non-enjambment. Invention, i.e. singularity, is manifested from prose.
"Text Curtain" enters into this symbolic space between prose and poem; the invention of the piece is manifested from the prose. The semiotic horizon is the shifting phoneme hung from their thread; this horizon is directed by the experiencer of the piece. The shifting terms on the screen in stasis are the philosophical generality of communication as communication; placed under the eyes of reader/experiencer, interpenetration occurs: fluid signification manifests as poetic singularity. Enjambment in "Text Curtain" requires the horizon (participation and all possible contexts) of the participating reader. In other words, the curtain of text in "Text Curtain" when pulled away reveals/revels in the freedom of the reader in the reader's engagement; it reveals/revels in the agency of signification.
Agamben, Giorgio. Idea of Prose. State University of New York Press. Albany, NY. 1995.
Agamben, Giorgio. The End of the Poem. Stanford University Press. Stanford, CA. 1999.
No comments:
Post a Comment